Psychology

My "Strange Time"

« Index | First post of today | Topic history New! | This topic at http://peakoil.com | Reply | Need to read back farther? Try Topic history
ReverseEngineer
2 days ago • Saturday 2008-11-22 02:20:00 • Reply
Heineken wrote:
Engineer, thank you.

I have seen changes in you since you joined.

Good job.


I haven't changed Heineken. Your PERCEPTION of me has changed.

Reverse Engineer
Ronin
2 days ago • Saturday 2008-11-22 03:16:00 • Reply
Hello Heineken,

I've come into this thread a bit late, you're all better. Smile
Glad to hear it mate. I thought I'd share with you a piece of music that always helps me through dispassionate times, it is Tool- Parabol.

Keep on truckin Smile
emeraldg40
2 days ago • Saturday 2008-11-22 10:28:00 • Reply
vision-master wrote:
Don't Fear the Reaper



Love that song thanks for the link
Heineken
1 day ago • Saturday 2008-11-22 19:35:00 • Reply
ReverseEngineer wrote:
Heineken wrote:
Engineer, thank you.

I have seen changes in you since you joined.

Good job.


I haven't changed Heineken. Your PERCEPTION of me has changed.

Reverse Engineer


Yes, my perception of you, as shaped by what you write.
Heineken
1 day ago • Saturday 2008-11-22 19:37:00 • Reply
Ronin wrote:
Hello Heineken,

I've come into this thread a bit late, you're all better. Smile
Glad to hear it mate. I thought I'd share with you a piece of music that always helps me through dispassionate times, it is Tool- Parabol.

Keep on truckin Smile


Can't say I'm ALL better, but I heartily thank you for your kind words.
ReverseEngineer
1 day ago • Saturday 2008-11-22 21:22:00 • Reply
Heineken wrote:
ReverseEngineer wrote:
Heineken wrote:
Engineer, thank you.

I have seen changes in you since you joined.

Good job.


I haven't changed Heineken. Your PERCEPTION of me has changed.

Reverse Engineer


Yes, my perception of you, as shaped by what you write.


Without doubt, because I have an outrageously dramatic style of writing, quite a few people here misperceive what I write, but as time goes by, more and more people here on Peak Oil have come to understand it. I am greatful that I have been able to achieve that now. So was the case on my own board, it took me quite some time to get people to understand the meaning behind the drama.

You know, I can write plain prose, but its not an accurate reflection of how I think. I do perceive life as a grand drama, and so I write to reflect that. Read for the underlying meaning, as you would seek the meaning in Shakespeare, its all couched in Comedy or Tragedy. I am no Shakespeare, but I do my best to evoke emotion and to ferret out the deeper truth that lies beyond the plain prose, the facts and the figures of depleting oil supplies and a shrinking Dow Jones Industrial Average.

I write to satisfy mainly my own muse, the reactions I get sometimes can be incredibly vitriolic, I am used to it. Read for the meaning, enjoy the entertainment value of it. Or if you disagree, take me on. Its what I live for.

Reverse Engineer
Heineken
1 day ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 11:35:00 • Reply
RE, some of your commentary has a bombastic air that I think turns many off, because it is perceived as egotistical. Perhaps you don't intend that, but that is how it comes off---less frequently now than formerly, perhaps, which is what I was getting at in my earlier post.

Consider writing with your audience more strongly in mind.
ReverseEngineer
1 day ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 11:52:00 • Reply
Heineken wrote:
RE, some of your commentary has a bombastic air that I think turns many off, because it is perceived as egotistical. Perhaps you don't intend that, but that is how it comes off---less frequently now than formerly, perhaps, which is what I was getting at in my earlier post.

Consider writing with your audience more strongly in mind.


I'm quite aware the style is bombastic Smile Its over the top in some cases, periodically I get reprimands for going too far. Thing is, it gets people's emotions riled up when you do this, and that gets you to underlying truth. You do not get this if you write to appeal to the masses or "make friends".

I DO consider the audience when I write Heineken. I often write with the specific goal of pissing off people Smile Its the only way you get responses out of people that come from deep inside, from the soul. You write plain prose, you get a lot of boring platitudes. I'm not interested in that stuff.

Anyhow, I try to make it entertaining and I try to make it informative, or at least question well the information before me since I don't know near as much about some of these topics as others here do. As to the style it comes off my keyboard with, well you can love it or hate it, but about nobody would say its boring stuff Wink

Reverse Engineer
Heineken
1 day ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 14:50:00 • Reply
RE, I don't agree with the reasoning behind your communication strategy, but I respect you for standing by it. Be who you are.

I believe in the power of humility, restraint, and brevity. For me, language framed in that way communicates with more force than your preferred approach.

I submit that exaggeration and excess weaken rather than strengthen communication. This is an irony perhaps, but it is ineradicably true and is the path of our greatest writers, such as Hemingway.
dunewalker
1 day ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 15:34:00 • Reply
Heineken wrote:
I believe in the power of humility, restraint, and brevity. For me, language framed in that way communicates with more force than your preferred approach.


That works best for me as an audience. As soon as I lose rapport with the writer/speaker, I turn off their message. I think RE can influence a different audience with more humility--an audience that may actually have a more constructive reaction to his message. I think why Heineken's, as well as my, impression of RE's writings has improved is because we have made the effort to see the wisdom in much of what he writes and have been willing to let the egotism flow by the wayside. Others may not have as much time or patience.
ReverseEngineer
23 hours ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 16:04:00 • Reply
Heineken wrote:

I submit that exaggeration and excess weaken rather than strengthen communication. This is an irony perhaps, but it is ineradicably true and is the path of our greatest writers, such as Hemingway.


I'm not a big fan of Hemingway. I take most of my inspiration from Dr. Hunter S. Thompson, the King of Gonzo. Smile

I understand your perspective, I just don't agree with it. Anyhow, it appears to me that despite what problems you have with the style, you have come to understand the underlying meaning, so perhaps now you can just enjoy the paint job for its entertainment value Wink

Reverse Engineer
Pops
22 hours ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 17:10:00 • Reply
Just so I know, are we talking about Heine's or RE's thoughts now?
ReverseEngineer
22 hours ago • Sunday 2008-11-23 17:20:00 • Reply
Pops wrote:
Just so I know, are we talking about Heine's or RE's thoughts now?


Not sure what you are asking here, but I *think* we are now debating the relative merits of a demure and compact writing style versus an over the top and bombastic one. Somewhat removed discussion from the OP, but since Heineken has recovered from his brief resignation phase, this is a worthwhile discussion of means and methods of communication Smile

Reverse Engineer
galacticsurfer
12 hours ago • Monday 2008-11-24 02:54:00 • Reply
Everyone comes into their own style with time. Kids grow up and copy their parents and then their peers and eventually just become consciously themselves. When someone comes into a room or a new company then the atmosphere is so that people have to learn who and what this person is about. What is meant as offensive, as a joke, is he an idiot or a kindred soul, whatever. After a while most of the variations are just ignored as he/she is well known. Then Mood of the day, maintenance of relations, perseverance and courtesy becomes critical as the whole thing is a serious project(job, whatever), as in here we are having a permanent debate on our future and we are not, say, trolls, just trying to get a rise out of others then moving on to the next website under another pseudonym. Acutally that might be fun if one were totally against the POV of a certain group(Nazis, Satanists, etc.), but I am no warrior.
Heineken
9 hours ago • Monday 2008-11-24 06:39:00 • Reply
As Pops implied, I think the discussion of writing style merits a thread of its own. I am principally to blame for this thread going off track.
ReverseEngineer
4 hours ago • Monday 2008-11-24 10:53:00 • Reply
Heineken wrote:
As Pops implied, I think the discussion of writing style merits a thread of its own. I am principally to blame for this thread going off track.


What Forum would you put such a discussion in? Could be an entertaining thread. At any rate, I'll share the blame with you for getting off track here.

And now, a word from our sponsor...The Times get Stranger Every Day.

Reverse Engineer
Pops
3 hours ago • Monday 2008-11-24 11:59:00 • Reply
Try this, Define your writing style...
davep
3 hours ago • Monday 2008-11-24 12:08:00 • Reply
ReverseEngineer wrote:
...At any rate, I'll share the blame with you for getting off track here.

And now, a word from our sponsor...The Times get Stranger Every Day.

Reverse Engineer


With that kind of empathetic post, you'll soon be losing your cred. Very Happy
ReverseEngineer
44 minutes ago • Monday 2008-11-24 15:06:00 • Reply
Pops wrote:
Try this, Define your writing style...


Ah, one of those buried "Open Forum" threads that nobody reads because they don't appear in the Last 24 Hours listing Wink

Reverse Engineer
ReverseEngineer
42 minutes ago • Monday 2008-11-24 15:08:00 • Reply
davep wrote:
ReverseEngineer wrote:
...At any rate, I'll share the blame with you for getting off track here.

And now, a word from our sponsor...The Times get Stranger Every Day.

Reverse Engineer


With that kind of empathetic post, you'll soon be losing your cred. Very Happy


I'm doing an "image makeover". LOL.

Reverse Engineer
ReverseEngineer
7 minutes ago • Monday 2008-11-24 15:43:00 • Reply
Pops wrote:
Try this, Define your writing style...


Dropped my style definition in the Define Your Writing Style thread Smile

Reverse Engineer

« Index | First post of today | Topic history New! | This topic at http://peakoil.com | Reply | Need to read back farther? Try Topic history